This case study describes a hub-and-spoke network created to expand perinatal substance use disorder care in rural western North Carolina. An urban specialty clinic supported eight rural partner sites through training, clinical guidance, and two-way referrals. The authors examined implementation at two sites: a federally qualified health center and an obstetrics practice. Both found coaching and shared clinical resources helpful for initiating buprenorphine treatment, although one site began prescribing within one year and the other required two years. The study illustrates how local circumstances affect implementation and does not establish comparative patient outcomes.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of substance use disorders (SUD) in the general population and in the pregnant person population has risen over the last 20 years. Concurrently, both perinatal and SUD care in rural areas is laden with access barriers including but not limited to geographical distance from potential treatment and stigma. An integrated outpatient perinatal substance use disorder (PSUD) clinic in an urban area in western North Carolina (WNC) found that patients who traveled further for prenatal care were less likely to continue seeking care in the postpartum period. Acknowledging that the risk of overdose increases in the postpartum period, the PSUD clinic utilized a hub and spoke model to promote healthcare accessibility.
Methods: The clinic adapted the Vermont hub and spoke model and the CHARM (Children and Recovering Mothers) collaborative. The urban hub in WNC has now developed eight spokes in rural communities. The hub provides education and technical assistance to the rural spokes, and the two engage in bidirectional referral pathways. This manuscript details the model and analyzes the existing strengths and barriers at two spokes, a family medicine Federally Qualified Health Center and a hospital affiliated obstetrics and gynecology practice and analyzes their process of implementation of integrated outpatient perinatal substance use care.
Results: Both spokes found coaching relationships and the sharing of resources such as clinical guidelines useful to begin prescribing buprenorphine for PSUD. Their context led one spoke to begin prescribing within one year while the other took two years.
Conclusion: Comparing and contrasting these spokes serves to demonstrate that across many contexts, a hub and spoke model is a replicable intervention for rural perinatal substance use access to care barriers. Comparing the two spokes emphasizes the need for adaptation as well as standardization of the model to improve evidence-based PSUD care most effectively.
